¶1Appellant was convicted of burglary, and assessed the lowest punishment. There is no bill of exceptions nor
¶2statement of facts in the record, and no question raised that can be considered in their absence.
¶3The judgment is affirmed.
188 S.W. 991
Davis v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided October 18, 1916
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · decided 1916-10-18
<p>Appeal from Criminal District Court, Dallas County; W. L. Crawford, Jr., Judge.</p> <p>Andrew Davis was convicted of burglary, and appeals.</p>
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1957
3 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Affirmed · Decided 1916-10-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →