State v. Ivy’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
8
states following
June 2018
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Crawford v. Washington · Shepard v. United States · Ring v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable 1 as a witness: [[Image here]] (6) Forfeiture by Wrongdoing. — A statement offered against a party that has engaged in wrongdoing that was intended to and did procure the unavailability of the declarant as a witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Brooks“The [forfeiture by wrongdoing] rule contains no limitation on the subject matter of the statements that it exempts from the prohibition on hearsay evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Zimmerman“is not limited to those cases in which a formal charge or judicial proceeding was pending against a defendant when the declarant's statements were made”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Peterson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.