Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 SW3D 132 - State v. Ivy

State v. Ivy’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
8
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

21 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Crawford v. Washington · Shepard v. United States · Ring v. Arizona

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable 1 as a witness: [[Image here]] (6) Forfeiture by Wrongdoing. — A statement offered against a party that has engaged in wrongdoing that was intended to and did procure the unavailability of the declarant as a witness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The [forfeiture by wrongdoing] rule contains no limitation on the subject matter of the statements that it exempts from the prohibition on hearsay evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not limited to those cases in which a formal charge or judicial proceeding was pending against a defendant when the declarant's statements were made”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.