Reynolds v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[B]ecause appellees did not move for summary judgment as to whether appel-lees misrepresented Murphy’s “talents and skills” by failing to disclose his past performance as a fund manager, they were not entitled to either a traditional or no-evidence summary judgment on that particular claim. [[Image here]] We sustain [appellant’s] sixth issue as to his fraud and misrepresentation claims based on the allegation that ap-pellees represented Murphy’s talents and skills in an untrue light by failing to disclose his past performance as a fund manager. [[Image here]] Having determined that appellees were entitled to summary judgment on all of [appellant’s] claims except his claim that appellees engaged in fraud and misrepresentation by failing to disclose Murphy’s past performance as a fund manager, we affirm the trial court’s judgment except as to that claim. We reverse and remand the claim that ap-pellees engaged in fraud and misrepresentation by fading to disclose Murphy’s past performance as a fund manager for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Reynolds v. Murphy