Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 VA 108 - Crew v. Nelson

Crew v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently January 1997 · most notably Harris v. Dunham (1962), Durham v. National Pool Equipment Co. (1964)

3 federal appellate · 39 state decisions

180194819501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Massie v. Firmstone · Virginia Railway & Power Co. v. Godsey · Tennes v. Tennes · Bassett v. Wood · Tignor v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . [I]n a personal injury case, if the plaintiff, a person of average intelligence and in possession of his faculties, while detailing the circumstances of the accident, clearly and unequivocally testifies to facts which show as a matter of law that he has no case, he is bound thereby and cannot recover.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is a matter of common knowledge that frequently a person's observation and recollection of swiftly moving events immediately preceding the crash in which he is severely injured are confused and distorted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “that such testimony of the litigant has the force of a judicial admission.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.