Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 188 WIS 68 - La Valley v. State

La Valley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently December 2007

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 22 state decisions

60192519301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hutchins v. State · People v. Turner · Weeks v. Hasty · Butler v. State · Walker v. Hunter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““And so it is with jury trials. In order that the institution be preserved and its usefulness continued, its deliberations and pronouncements must be kept pure, and untainted not only from all improper influences but from the appearance thereof. It is often said that the jury trial is one of the bulwarks of our liberty. But it will remain so only so long as public confidence in the institution prevails.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Jurors are rarely, perhaps, wilfully guilty of improper conduct to disturb their verdict. A well-meaning juror who is unconsciously so guilty will honestly deny it. An evil-minded juror consciously so guilty will be very apt to deny it. So that a juror’s denial . . . can weigh little.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““It will be noticed that the statute does not in express terms cover misconduct of the jury, and, at any rate, we should be very reluctant to find that such misconduct did not affect substantial rights.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.