188 Wis. 2d 202 - Johnson v. Kokemoor’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1996
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 124 Wis. 2d 525 - State v. Dyess · Canterbury v. Spence · 68 Wis. 2d 1 - Scaria v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance · Hales v. Pittman · 168 Wis. 2d 175 - State v. Jenkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“, then and then only answer this question: Would a reasonable person in Donna Johnson's position have refused to consent to the surgery by Dr. Richard Kokemoor had she been informed of the risks and advantages of the surgery? The jury answered”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“a serious danger [that] the jury may confuse a duty to provide average quality care with a duty to adequately inform of medical risks.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“reverse where there is a reasonable possibility that the error contributed to the final result.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.