Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Ariz. 627 - Herrell v. Sargeant

Herrell v. Sargeant’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2022

7 state decisions

301997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Chapple · State v. Coconino Cty. Superior Ct., Div. II · Crimmins v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CY. · State v. Emery · Priestly v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Given the unique facts of this case and its similarities to Crimmins , we believe it should have been apparent to the deputy county attorney presenting the case the second time that to have a fair and impartial presentation, it was necessary to inform the grand jury about Herrell's version of the relevant, substantive facts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “on proper request, ... to inform the grand jury of any exculpatory matters.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.