Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Cal. 682 - In Re Peppers

In Re Peppers’s Empirical Analysis

1922

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
5
states following
August 2001
most recently cited

2 district · 67 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2001 · most notably 50 Cal. 2d 383 - People v. Wein (1958), 49 Cal. 2d 409 - People v. McCaughan (1957)

2 district · 67 state decisions

260192219301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Reese · Ex Parte Daniels · Hewitt v. Board of Medical Examiners · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Commonwealth · People v. Parks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “oranges shall be considered unfit for shipment when frosted to the extent of endangering the reputation of the citrus industry”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.