Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 CALAPP2D 49 - Tarman v. Sherwin

Tarman v. Sherwin’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 1974
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 61 Cal. App. 2d 544 - Westphal v. Westphal · Savage v. Smith · Reher v. Reed · Hecq v. Conner · 46 Cal. App. 198 - Fitzhugh v. University of Realty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We have also reviewed the affidavits filed on the previous motion. While they do not present a strong case for transfer, plaintiff made no attack upon the order granting change of venue. He did not move to vacate the order, as he might have done if grounds under Code of Civil Procedure, section 473, existed. (Badella v. Miller, 44 Cal.2d 81 [ 279 P.2d 729]) ... . As a result, he cannot now attack that order and we must assume it to be sound.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.