Jorgensen v. Shaff’s Empirical Analysis
189 F.2d 264 · 1951
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
July 1955
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Lavin v. Pierotti · Smith v. Warnock · Jorgensen v. Ericson · Ericson v. Jorgensen · 81 F. Supp. 621 - Jorgensen v. Otto Henning & Carter Carburetor Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While testimony was being taken, the control device attached to a Schebler carburetor was operated inter partes at a temperature of 22° Fahrenheit with satisfactory results. While that might be a circumstance favoring appellant, nevertheless, it has long been established that in the absence of adequate corroboration of reduction to practice, successful operation of a device many years subsequent to its alleged reduction to practice cannot be considered as proof thereof.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hunt v. Coffey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.