Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 F.2d 369 - Cates v. Haderlein

Cates v. Haderlein’s Empirical Analysis

189 F.2d 369 · 1951

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
October 1973
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 1973

9 federal appellate ·

70195119601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001 · 5 U.S.C. § 1004

Relies on Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · Rochester Telephone Corporation v. United States · Durland v. United States · Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States · American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnulty

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.