In re Patrick’s Empirical Analysis
189 F.2d 614 · 1951
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 33
Relies on Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. · General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp. · Brand v. Thomas · Hunt v. Armour & Co. · Standard Brands, Inc. v. National Grain Yeast Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“195. Affidavits after appeal. Affidavits or exhibits submitted after the case has been appealed will not be admitted without a showing of good and sufficient reasons why they were not earlier presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.