Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 F.2d 645 - Partridge v. Presley

Partridge v. Presley’s Empirical Analysis

189 F.2d 645 · 1951

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
5
states following
July 1984
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently July 1984 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), United States v. Haldeman (1976)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

1401951196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on William Smith v. Guy Richards · Mosier v. Federal Reserve Bank · Hoffman v. Partridge · Gardner v. Capital Transit Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “served not later than ten days after the entry of judgment.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “instead of being unnecessary, as was the subsequent order in the Mosier case, the order * * * was the first and only disposition of the pending motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.