Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 F.3d 1017 - Ambassador Hotel Co. v. Wei-Chuan Investment

Ambassador Hotel Co. v. Wei-Chuan Investment’s Empirical Analysis

189 F.3d 1017 · 1999

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
3
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Daou Systems Inc v. V W (2005), Nursing Home Pension Fund, Local 144 v. Oracle Corp. (2010)

33 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

500199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Herman & MacLean v. Huddleston · Superintendent of Insurance of State of New York v. Bankers Life and Casualty Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must have more than some tangential relation to the securities transaction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “for any person ... [t]o use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security ... any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the Commission may prescribe[.]”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must prove both actual cause (`transaction causation') and proximate cause (`loss causation').”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.