Proyecto San Pablo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis
189 F.3d 1130 · 1999
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Orquera v. Ashcroft (2003), Gebhardt v. Nielsen (2018)
14 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Bell v. Hood · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Reno v. Catholic Social Services, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) ] expressly forbids the INS from using the legalization process to lure illegal aliens into its control for the purposes of deportation. In order to encourage aliens to use the IRCA process, a firewall of sorts is erected between IRCA applications and deportation proceedings. The INS must learn about an alien’s unlawful presence independently of any legalization application in order to initiate deportation proceedings.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Limitation to review of deportation. There shall be judicial review of such a denial only in the judicial review of an order of deportation under section 1105a of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“judicial review of a determination respecting an application for adjustment”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ramos v. Nielsen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.