Federation of Advertising Industry Representatives, Inc. v. City of Chicago’s Empirical Analysis
189 F.3d 633 · 1999
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1331 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1334 (Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp. · Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc. · Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr · New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance · 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“cannot imagine that Congress intended the states to be without power to prohibit a cigarette company from handing out free cigarettes in an elementary school yard.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“signs located near highways, signs in certain commercial and manufacturing zoning areas, signs at certain sports facilities, signs inside a store that is licensed to sell alcohol and cigarette products, signs on commercial vehicles transporting such products, and signs identifying the premises upon which such products are sold.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“generic, as opposed to brand-specific, mention of a tobacco product.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.