Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 F.3d 86 - Keren Limited Partnership Cushman Wakefield of Connecticut Inc Cushman Wakefield Inc v. Keren Limited Partnership Swiss Bank Corporation Ubs Ag

Keren Limited Partnership Cushman Wakefield of Connecticut Inc Cushman Wakefield Inc v. Keren Limited Partnership Swiss Bank Corporation Ubs Ag’s Empirical Analysis

189 F.3d 86 · 1999

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
September 2015
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2015 · most notably In Re: Aquatic Development Group, Inc. (2003), In Re: Donald H Albrecht Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Young Pc

6 federal appellate · 1 district ·

210199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco · F/s Airlease II Inc v. Simon S-J Swig Investment Company Aircraft Trust No F/s Airlease II Inc Simon S-J F/s Airlease II Inc · Nostas Associates v. Costich · In Re Donald Jarvis and Joyce Jarviss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]unc pro tunc approval should only be granted in narrow situations and requires that (i) if the application had been timely, the court would have authorized the [relief], and (ii) the delay in seeking [the relief requested] resulted from extraordinary circumstances.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e review a bankruptcy court's decision regarding such approval for abuse of discretion,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the actual, necessary costs and expenses of preserving the estate, including wages, salaries, or commissions for services rendered after the commencement of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.