Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 F.3d 895 - United States of America v. Jerry Wayne Mayfield

United States of America v. Jerry Wayne Mayfield’s Empirical Analysis

189 F.3d 895 · 1999

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably United States v. Hanley (1999), United States of America v. Ralph Pena-Gutierrez (2000)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

260199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Olano · Bruton v. United States · Richardson v. Marsh · Zafiro v. United States · Gray v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a variety of factors, including whether the testimony was cumulative, the presence or absence of [evidence] corroborating or contradicting the testimony on material points, the extent of cross-examination, and of course, the overall strength of the prosecution's case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The test for abuse of discretion by the district court is whether the joint trial was so manifestly prejudicial as to require the trial judge to exercise his discretion in just one way, by ordering a separate trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The entire focus of the Supreme Court's analysis has been whether a constitutional violation occurred despite the court's limiting instruction and the accompanying presumption that juries follow such instructions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.