Penick v. Mirro’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently July 1987
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Southern Express Company v. John Byers · Williamson v. Bennett · Mack v. South Bound R. R. · Sanford v. Ware · Bowles v. May
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But there must be a suffering of greater substance than a pure, isolated mental anguish, such as fright, anxiety or apprehensiveness.” id at 949.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Banks v. Price · Bradley v. Forrest“of substance and sufficiently identifiable in the person of the claimant,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Banks v. Price
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.