Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Ga. App. 181 - Frye v. State

189 Ga. App. 181 - Frye v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently November 2013

13 state decisions

501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Humphrey v. State · 185 Ga. App. 54 - Phillips v. State · 185 Ga. App. 728 - Ostrom v. Kapetanakos · 187 Ga. App. 132 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant is correct that to be guilty of the offense of driving under the influence one must drive or be in actual physical control of a moving vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. Carr v. State, 169 Ga. App. 679 (2) ( 314 SE2d 694 ) (1984). However, “ ‘(i)t is well settled that the driving of an automobile while intoxicated may be shown by circumstantial evidence.’ (Cits.)” Phillips v. State, 185 Ga. App. 54 (1) ( 363 SE2d 283 ) (1987). “ ‘In order to sustain the judgment of conviction, the evidence need not exclude every inference or hypothesis except the guilt of the accused, but only reasonable inferences and hypotheses, so as to justify the inference, beyond a reasonable doubt, of guilt.’ (Cit.)” Frye v. State, 189 Ga. App. 181 ( 375 SE2d 101 ) (1988).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.