Murphy v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1901
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2009 · most notably 234 Ill. 2d 478 - Green v. Rogers (2009), Roda v. Berko (1948)
5 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gage v. Lewis · Jones v. Albee · Gallager v. Brunel · Smith v. Brittenham · Walton v. Westwood
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘A mere statement that the plaintiff is informed, or is informed and believes, puts in issue only his information and belief, and not the truth or falsity of the facts thus referred to.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.