Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 ILL 456 - Pease v. Ditto

Pease v. Ditto’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2014

2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

70190119101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedDitto v. Pease

Relationships

Relies on Ogden v. Larrabee · Chandler v. Lincoln · Ludden v. Leaviti · Van Namee v. Bradley · Cummins v. Holmes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That whenever any goods or chattels shall have been wrongfully distrained, or otherwise wrongfully taken or shall be wrongfully detained, an action of replevin may be brought . . . . ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.