Anderson v. Dunn’s Empirical Analysis
1962
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 1983
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on City of Kansas City v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. · Capland v. Board of Dental Examiners · Brinkley v. Hassig · Marks v. Frantz · Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Sloan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The action at bar is not one to question the proceedings of the county board, but an independent action to recover taxes paid tender protest. This action is not even one to review the proceedings of the State Board of Tax Appeals. (Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Sloan, 188 Kan. 231 , 361 P. 2d 889 ; City of Kansas City v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 187 Kan. 701 , 360 P. 2d 29 .) (p.228.) (Emphasis supplied.)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.