Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 KAN 39 - Dirks v. Goertz

Dirks v. Goertz’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1964
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Estate of Demoret · In Re Estate of Kruse · In Re Linzy · National Reserve Life Insurance v. Hand · Nicolay v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The perfection of an appeal from the probate court to the district court is a simple matter. The party making the appeal shall serve upon all adverse parties or their attorneys of record, or upon the probate judge for the adverse parties a written notice of appeal specifying the judgment or decision appealed from, and make proper proof of service * * *. It is not required that service be had upon all three to perfect the appeal; proper service upon any one of the three named is sufficient (In re Estate of Patterson, 185 Kan. 135, 136 , 340 P.2d 369 ).” 367 P. 2d at 55 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.