Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 La. 544 - State v. Dierlamm

State v. Dierlamm’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
3
states following
July 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2000 · most notably State v. Brogdon (1983), Hall v. State (1960)

2 federal appellate · 25 state decisions

12019381940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Norris v. State of Alabama · State v. Eisenhardt · Vander Sluys v. Finfrock · State v. Quinn · State v. Warlick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... directs the attention of the jury to the fact that defendant did not testify in his own behalf, which is, in effect a comment on the facts and an invasion of defendant's constitutional rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.