Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Md. 596 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

78
cited by 78 later decisions
1
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 78 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably Dempsey v. State (1976), Gill v. State (1972)

3 federal appellate · 4 district · 69 state decisions

3101948195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Avery v. State of Alabama · White v. Ragen · Jones v. State · Davis v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Before a confession can be admitted in evidence, the State must show, to the satisfaction of the court, that it was the free and voluntary act of an accused; that no force or coercion was exercised by the officers obtaining the confession, to cause the accused to confess; that no hope or promise was held out to an accused for the purpose of inducing him to confess.””
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““We are of opinion that the best practice is to hear evidence on the preliminary question [of whether a confession by the accused was freely and voluntarily made] out of the presence of the jury, and we recommend such practice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.