Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Md. 640 - Davis v. State

Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
7
states following
July 1989
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1989 · most notably Rochin v. People of California (1952), Breithaupt v. Abram (1957)

30 state decisions

13019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Holt v. United States · Lawrence v. State · Shanks v. State · Murphy v. State · Meisinger v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . There is no substantial difference between obtaining a specimen of blood from an accused and obtaining his fingerprints, or physical property, the possession of which by him is a pertinent question at issue in a felony charge against him. Whatever may be the rule in other jurisdictions we have long since adopted the rule that the admission of evidence thus obtained is not a violation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, and we so hold in this case.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““This State has aligned itself with those jurisdictions holding that the question of how evidence is obtained is collateral to the issue of the guilt or innocence of the accused, and, therefore, pertinent evidence, no matter how obtained, will be admitted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.