189 Md. App. 474 - Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
July 2020
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Broadrick v. Oklahoma · Connally v. General Construction Co. · Smith v. Goguen · Coates v. City of Cincinnati
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the statute does not require a threat of physical harm.... Nor does the statute require proof that the party making the threat had an actual intent to commit the harm to another. The critical element is the threat of harm, intentionally communicated to the witness for the purpose of retaliating against the witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hammonds v. State“[T]he test for evidentiary sufficiency is whether, after viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the State, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.