189 Misc. 2d 419 - In re Millan’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 2252A (§ 101 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996)
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he jurisdictional requirement [of the federal law was] in addition to all other elements, and not in substitution therefor. While an essential element necessary for a conviction in New York missing in the Federal prosecution would bar a conviction in such proceeding from consideration under [New York's sex offender registration law], an additional element should not. [ Id. at 394-95.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the offense be committed by the use of the mails or other shipment or transport in interstate commerce, including by computer,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“should be liberally construed to accomplish the express intent of the New York Legislature”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.