Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

189 N.C. 248

126 S.E 610

State v. . Dove

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1925

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1925-03-04

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1964

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1925-03-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pee Oueiam.

¶1 Tbe defendant was indicted for transporting intoxicating liquor in -violation of law. Tbe verdict was returned in tbe afternoon and wben tbe court reconvened tbe next morning tbe defendant sought to impeach tbe verdict by a statement of one of tbe jurors who was contradicted by all tbe others. In S. v. Best, 111 N. C., 638, tbe Court said: “We find ourselves concluded by tbe authority of an established and long-settled rule based upon tbe wisest reasons of public policy, that a juror should not be permitted to impeach bis own conduct in tbe rendition of a verdict.” S. v. Hall, 181 N. C., 527; S. v. Brittain, 89 N. C., 482.

¶2 Tbe motion to dismiss was properly refused.

¶3 We find

¶4 No error.

/189/nc/248 · .json · Public domain