Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 N.C. 408 - Nash v. . Royster

Nash v. . Royster’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
9
states following
May 2002
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently May 2002 · most notably Shearin v. Lloyd (1957), Wall v. Stout (1984)

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

190192519301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As a general rule, in the absence of any special agreement limiting the service, or reasonable notice to the patient, when a surgeon is employed to perform an operation, he must not only use reasonable and ordinary care, skill and diligence in its performance, but, in the subsequent treatment of the case, he must also give, or see that the patient is given, such attention as the necessity of the case demands.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A physician or surgeon may agree to perform an operation without undertaking or rendering himself responsible for the subsequent treatment of the- case. He thus contracts against liability beyond the exercise of reasonable care, diligence and skill in the performance of the operation and for such services as are contemplated by both parties to the special or limited contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A physician or surgeon is not bound to render professional services to every one who applies, and he may, therefore, by notice or special agreement, limit the extent and scope of his employment. Such is the simple law of contract.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.