Clark v. . Homes’s Empirical Analysis
1925
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably State v. Williams (1975), Hart v. Thomasville Motors, Inc. (1956)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Olcott v. Bynum · Reynolds v. Lloyd Cotton Mills · Carter v. . Rountree · Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Manufacturing Co. · Card v. Finch.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Venue is not jurisdictional and may be waived, and cannot be tested by demurrer, but by motion in the cause (citing authorities). Venue now is not jurisdictional and may be waived (citing authorities). Venue cannot be jurisdictional and it may always be waived,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wynne v. . Conrad“a judgment rendered by a court against a citizen affecting his vested rights, in an action or proceeding to which he is not a party, is absolutely void, and may be treated as a nullity whenever it is brought to the attention of the Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. . Whilden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.