Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

189 N.C. 831

126 S.E 926

State v. . Hughes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1925

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1925-03-11

Decided 1925-03-11

Per Curiam.

¶1 The only assignment of error is based upon defendants’ exception to the refusal of the court' to allow their motion, ■ at the close of all the evidence, for judgment of nonsuit. C. S., 4643. We do not deem it necessary to set out the evidence, which is stated in the case on appeal. The testimony of the witness, if found by the jury to be true, was sufficient evidence to sustain the allegations of the indictment. There was no error in the refusal of defendants’ motion. No other error is assigned by defendants. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict. Upon the whole record there is

¶2 No error.

/189/nc/831 · .json · Public domain