Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

189 N.C. 832

127 S.E 925

Dickens v. . Drewry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 11, 1925

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1925-03-11

Decided 1925-03-11

Pee Cueiam.

¶1 Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in bis favor, alleging errors on tbe issues relating to damages. He thinks tbe amounts awarded are too small. A careful perusal of tbe record leaves us witb tbe impression that tbe case bas been tried substantially in agreement with’ tbe law bearing on tbe subject and tbat no reversible or prejudicial error was committed on tbe trial.

¶2 No benefit would be derived from a discussion, seriatim,, of tbe several exceptions and assignments of error, as they present no new or novel point of law not heretofore settled by our decisions.

¶3 Tbe verdict and judgment will be upheld.

¶4 No error.

/189/nc/832 · .json · Public domain