189 N.C. App. 482 - Clay v. Monroe’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 166 N.C. App. 283 - White v. Consolidated Planning, Inc. · 159 N.C. App. 626 - Sterner v. Penn · 185 N.C. App. 668 - Wilkins v. Safran · Stetser v. Tap Pharm. Prods., Inc. · Wynn v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) a relationship of trust and confidence, (2) that the defendant took advantage of that position of trust in order to benefit himself, and (3) that plaintiff was, as a result, injured. Intent to deceive is not an element of constructive fraud. The primary difference between pleading a claim for constructive fraud and one for breach of fiduciary duty is the constructive fraud requirement that the defendant benefit himself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`Assignments of error not set out in the appellant's brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned.' N.C.R. App. P. 28(b)(6)(2007).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the ad valorem tax value assessed by a county is [ ] allowed as evidence of the value of real property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.