Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 OHIOAPP3D 154 - In re D.L.

In re D.L.’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2021
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gault · In re Oliver · Schall v. Martin · In re C.S. · In re Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person's inherent right to proceed pro se in any court pertains only to that person and does not extend to the person's spouse, child, or solely owned corporation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he rendering of Guernsey County, Case Nos. 20CA12 & 20CA16 9 legal services for another [person] by any person not admitted to practice in Ohio.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[J]udges have the ethical duty to prevent the unauthorized practice of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.