State v. Raber’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited
37 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · State v. Thompkins · Edwards v. Arizona · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Long
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“But if a suspect makes a reference to an attorney that is ambiguous or equivocal in that a reasonable officer in light of the circumstances would have understood only that the suspect might be invoking the right to counsel, [Supreme Court] precedents do not require the cessation of questioning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Huguley“Accepting these facts as true, the appellate court must then independently determine, without deference to the conclusion of the trial court, whether the facts satisfy the applicable legal standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Huguley“Well, can I talk to my lawyer then if there is something wrong like that?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Tichener
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.