Hook v. Hook’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Holcomb v. Holcomb · 119 Ohio App. 3d 155 - Barkley v. Barkley · 96 Ohio App. 3d 731 - Peck v. Peck · 137 Ohio App. 3d 563 - Okos v. Okos · 111 Ohio App. 3d 641 - Kelly v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that degree of proof which will provide in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to the facts sought to be established.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Buck v. Buck · Garrett v. Garrett“[t]he party asserting that a gift was separate property bears the burden of showing an intention to make a separate gift—to benefit one spouse and exclude the other spouse from any rights and interest in the items as marital property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Garrett v. Garrett
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.