Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

189 Or. 462

221 P.2d 575

Anthony v. Veatch

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1950

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1950-06-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1950-06-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2019 · most notably Federal Power Commission v. Oregon (1955), 302 F. Supp. 899 - Sohappy v. Smith (1969)

8 federal appellate · 5 district · 25 state decisions

1101950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1On Petition eor Rehearing

Before Lusk, Chief Justice, and Brand, Belt,* Rossman, Hat, and Latourette, Justices.

¶2Denied.

*505HAY, J.

¶3 The plaintiffs, who are appellants and cross respondents, have filed a petition for rehearing in this case based upon the asserted grounds (1) that the court erred in holding that there was evidence that fish traps take not only salmon but smaller fish which are usually not taken in gill-netting operations, and, (2) that we erred in holding that the evidence does not conclusively show that the initiative act fails to meet the test of reasonableness, and that, therefore, the presumption in favor of reasonableness should prevail.

¶4Although no brief accompanied the petition, we have re-examined our opinion in these respects, and are satisfied that the petition is not well-founded. It is therefore denied.

¶5In our opinion in this case we said that the cause would be remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent therewith. Upon further consideration we have concluded, in the state of the record, that a remand for further proceedings would be inappropriate. The cause will therefore be remanded with directions that it be dismissed.

/189/or/462 · .json · Public domain