Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 Pa. Super. 438 - Commonwealth v. Levitz

189 Pa. Super. 438 - Commonwealth v. Levitz’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 1985
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 1985

8 state decisions

301959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Matchin v. Matchin · Hawkins v. . Hawkins · 188 Pa. Super. 350 - Commonwealth ex rel. Gregory v. Gregory · 173 Pa. Super. 171 - Commonwealth Ex Rel. Brobst v. Brobst · 108 Pa. Super. 108 - Pierpoint v. Pierpoint

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The difficulty of obtaining direct evidence of adultery and the almost universal resort to circumstantial evidence, has given great importance to the doctrine known as the ‘inclination and opportunity rule’. Under this doctrine adultery will be presumed where three elements are shown: (1) the adulterous disposition or inclination of the defendant; (2) the adulterous disposition, or inclination, of the co-respondent; and (3) the opportunity created to satisfy their mutual adulterous inclination. The three elements must conjoin. Proof of mere opportunity without adulterous disposition, or of adulterous disposition without opportunity, will not be sufficient. But if the criminal passion is found to exist, proof of opportunity which otherwise would scarcely be sufficient to raise a passing cloud of suspicion will possess a most convincing force.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.