Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 SO 142 - Lerner v. Bischof

Lerner v. Bischof’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1973
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1973

6 state decisions

4019391940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jacobsen v. McGarry · Officer v. American Ins. Co. · Watson v. Schmidt · Hammond State Bank & Trust Co. v. Hammond Box & Veneer Co. · State v. Wyant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It will readily be seen from the foregoing that the Legislature has clearly indicated its purpose to restrain the appellate courts from dismissing an appeal for purely technical reasons.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.