Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

189 So. 2d 204

Taylor v. Mead

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1966-07-27

Relies on Taylor v. Horn

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1966-07-27

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1994

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

301966197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The chancellor entered an order denying the defendants-appellants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Our opinion and decision filed under this date in the case of Taylor, et al. v. W. S. Horn, D.O., Fla.App., 189 So.2d 198, a companion case, is decisive of this appeal. Accordingly, the order of denial is reversed and the cause remanded for entry of order of dismissal in conformance with that decision.

ALLEN, C. J., and LILES and KAN-NER, (RET.), JJ-, concur.
/189/so2d/204 · .json · Public domain