Novack v. Novack’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 39 So. 2d 554 - Yandell v. Yandell · Brickell v. Di Pietro · 135 So. 2d 206 - In re Krueger for Admission to the Florida Bar · 44 So. 2d 656 - Provus v. Provus · Kleinschmidt v. Kleinschmidt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * * * * "`Lawyers are officers of the court and justice should be administered economically, efficiently, and expeditiously. Attorney's fees are an important factor in the administration of justice, and if they are fixed without proper relationship to these facts it could result in a loss of public confidence in the bench and bar.'" * * * * * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Therefore, the order here under review is reversed, with directions that attorney's fees in the sum of $40,000, less the $3,500 heretofore awarded, be fixed, determined and allowed as reasonable attorney's fees." (At 515.) (Emphasis supplied.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Novack v. Novack
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.