189 So. 2d 656 - Rodriquez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently December 1993 · most notably 357 So. 2d 410 - McNamara v. State (1978), 355 So. 2d 180 - Taylor v. State (1978)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McDonald v. United States · People v. Maddox · Green v. United States · State v. Smith · Benefield v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It appears to me that these facts, known to the officers at the time they broke in, are consistent with a good faith belief on their part that they were excused from compliance with § 901.19(1) Fla. Stat., F.S.A., pursuant to the second exception outlined in Benefield v. State, Fla. 1964, 160 So.2d 706 , which is relied upon so heavily in Judge Swann's opinion; and the officers were justified in making their entry. Furthermore, it must also be noted that in this latter cited case there was no contention that the officers at any time announced their authority nor their purpose, whereas in the instant case the officers did announce their authority and they did wait for a response prior to breaking the interior door." 189 So.2d at 660-661 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Suarez v. State“comes to this court with a presumption of correctness [and] ... a reviewing court should not substitute its judgment for that of a trial court, but, rather, should defer to the trial court's authority as a factfinder.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cross“"Therefore these and the other grounds of the petition for rehearing having been found to be insufficient, the same be and it is hereby denied." 189 So.2d at 661 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Suarez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.