Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 SO3D 612 - Corrothers v. State

Corrothers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 986 So. 2d 928 - Moore v. State · Corrothers v. State · 960 So. 2d 379 - Ford Motor Co. v. Tennin · Brown v. State · 819 So. 2d 1177 - Russell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “such discovery is not frivolous and is likely to be helpful in the investigation, preparation or presentation of specific issues [.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “order entered in the sound discretion of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.