Roberts v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · 602 So. 2d 344 - IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc. · American Civil Liberties Union v. Barnes · 589 So. 2d 687 - Tuscaloosa County Com'n v. Deputy Sheriffs · 439 So. 2d 137 - Peebles v. Miley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"(1) the nature and value of the subject matter of the employment; (2) the learning, skill, and labor requisite to its proper discharge; (3) the time consumed; (4) the professional experience and reputation of the attorney; (5) the weight of his responsibilities; ... (10) the fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services; (11) the likelihood that a particular employment may preclude other employment; and (12) the time limitations imposed by the client or by the circumstances."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. T.C.M. v. W.L.K.“a trial court's order regarding an attorney fee must allow for meaningful appellate review by articulating the decisions made, the reasons supporting those decisions, and how [the trial court] calculated the attorney fee.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. T.C.M. v. W.L.K.“ascertain a reasonable fee or compensation to be allowed and paid to [a] guardian ad litem for services rendered,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. T.C.M. v. W.L.K.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.