Jenkins v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2015
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 777 So. 2d 399 - Blackwood v. State · Penalver v. State · 744 So. 2d 1232 - State v. Wiita · 837 So. 2d 429 - Alfaro v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellant's excluded testimony about what the stockade employee told him was not hearsay as those statements were being admitted to show the effect on the listener, that is, the reason Appellant left and did not register that day.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he testimony proffered by appellant was not hearsay because it was not offered 'to prove the truth of the matter asserted' .... It was, instead, offered to negate an essential element of both offenses-intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.