Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 S.W.3d 285 - Powell v. State

Powell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))

Relationships

Relies on Montgomery v. State · Manning v. State · United States v. Cruz · State v. Hampton · Powell v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant contends any relevance was substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.... TEX.R. EVID. 403.... The unfair prejudice ... lay in the possible appearance appellant was attempting to suborn perjury. As explained in the sufficiency complaint, even assuming Cox saw appellant, it does not follow that appellant committed the robbery.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “... Rule 403's "use of the word `may' reflects the draftsman's intent `that the trial judge be given a very substantial discretion in "balancing" probative value on the one hand and "unfair prejudice" on the other, and that he should not be reversed simply because an appellate court believes that it would have decided the matter otherwise.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.