Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 189 SW3D 339 - Dickey v. State

Dickey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 196th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Almanza v. State · Johnson v. State · Zuniga v. State · Gollihar v. State · Threadgill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether the indictment, as written, informed the defendant of the charge against him or her sufficiently to allow such defendant to prepare an adequate defense at trial, and whether prosecution under the deficiently drafted indictment would subject the defendant to the risk of being prosecuted later for the same crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.