Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

189 S.W.3d 640

Boyd v. Holden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2006

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2006-03-28

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently March 2015

17 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2006-03-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Willie Boyd appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his “Motion for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive Relief Pertaining to the Civil Rights of Willie E. Boyd, a/k/a., Willie E. Osborne.” He asserts that the court had jurisdiction to hear his petition seeking the court’s judgment that the named defendants, former and current Missouri public officials, are required by law to declare that certain of his civil rights were restored by sections 222.010, 560.610 and 216.355, RSMo 1969 (all repealed), because his state sentence, imposed for his 1967 bank robbery conviction, was commuted by then Governor Warren Hearnes, and the statutes “automatically” restored his civil rights permitting him to vote, serve on a jury, and run for political office. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

/189/sw3d/640 · .json · Public domain